Domains / Air

Bid it. Build it.
Prove it's airworthy.

Fighters, surveillance aircraft, and remotely piloted systems are won, delivered, and kept flying on certification evidence. One structured, traceable baseline carries all three — the proposal, the build, and airworthiness proof from need to verification to continuing airworthiness.

BID

The full bid pack decomposed in hours, with airworthiness and safety-of-flight criteria answered shall-by-shall before submission.

BUILD

Avionics and mission-system requirements carried through design, integration, and flight test on one thread — native in Azure DevOps.

COMPLIANCE

Certification-grade traceability generated as you work — DO-178C and airworthiness evidence ready for the authority, not rebuilt for it.

Program Scope

Where aerospace requirements get complicated.

Certification-heavy platforms, safety-of-flight obligations, and mission systems verified against airworthiness authorities no spreadsheet was built to satisfy.

FIGHTERS

Combat & fast-jet platforms

Avionics, weapons integration, and platform requirements across multi-decade acquisition and sustainment programs.

ISR

Surveillance & AEW&C

Sensor, mission-system, and data-handling requirements where traceability to evidence is the contract.

RPAS

Drones & remotely piloted

Fast-moving autonomous and dual-use air systems with layered airworthiness and integration obligations.

AVIONICS

Avionics & mission systems

The software-intensive requirements that dominate modern aerospace bids and certification packages.

SUPPLY

Aerospace supply chain

Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers flowing requirements down from primes on major air programs.

SUSTAINMENT

In-service & airworthiness

Requirements that persist for the airframe's life — upgrades, mods, and continuing airworthiness over decades.

The Aerospace Program Problem

A certification package, assembled by hand.

Aerospace solicitations carry dense safety and airworthiness criteria. The way most teams handle them is exactly why bids slip and certification audits sting.

How it's done today

  • ×Airworthiness and safety-of-flight requirements extracted by hand across avionics and platform specs
  • ×Compliance to MIL-STD, DO-178C, and STANAG tracked in spreadsheets that drift out of date
  • ×No reliable thread from an airworthiness requirement to its verification evidence
  • ×Amendments mid-bid that ripple through a certification baseline nobody can fully trace

With the platform

  • Automated decomposition of the full solicitation into a structured requirements tree in hours
  • Standards-aligned compliance matrix mapped to MIL-STD, airworthiness, and program-specific criteria
  • End-to-end traceability from need to requirement to verification, native in Azure DevOps
  • Impact analysis on amendments — see instantly what a change touches across the baseline
Speaks Your Language

Built to the vocabulary aerospace programs run on.

Not translated SaaS — the platform and its templates align to the standards and terminology air bids are actually evaluated against.

MIL-STD DO-178C airborne software STANAG NATO standardization MBSE model-based systems engineering V&V verification & validation Airworthiness evidence ITB industrial & technological benefits CMMI-aligned templates Configuration & change control Interface requirements DOORS legacy import

Bring us an aerospace solicitation — or a baseline. We'll show you the whole lifecycle.

A 25-minute demo on a realistic aerospace RFP — structured, traceable, and compliant, with nothing sensitive required.