Add Your Heading Text Here

Domains / Naval

Bid it. Build it.
Prove it — for the life of the fleet.

Surface combatants, submarines, and icebreakers are among the hardest programs in defence to bid, deliver, and defend at audit. One structured, traceable baseline carries all three — the proposal, the build, and the evidence maritime programs demand for thirty years.

BID

Decompose a CPSP-scale solicitation in hours and answer every mandatory — the compliance knockout engineered out before submission.

BUILD

The winning response becomes the fleet baseline — design, test, and validation on one thread across build, refit, and 30-year sustainment.

COMPLIANCE

MIL-STD and STANAG evidence accumulates as your engineers work — survivability and V&V proof ready for every program review.

Program Scope

Where naval requirements get complicated.

Long-lifecycle platforms, deep subcontractor chains, and mission systems that must be verified against sea-state and survivability conditions no spreadsheet was built to track.

SURFACE

Surface combatants & patrol

Combat systems, sensors, and hull-mechanical-electrical requirements across decades-long build and sustainment programs.

SUBSEA

Submarines & subsea

Survivability-critical requirements where verification evidence and change control aren't optional — they're the contract.

ARCTIC

Icebreakers & Arctic vessels

Cold-weather, dual-use, and sovereignty-linked platforms with layered civil and defence requirement obligations.

MISSION SYSTEMS

Combat & mission systems

C2, radar, sonar, and weapons integration — the software-heavy requirements that dominate modern naval bids.

MARINE SUPPLY

Marine supply chain

Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers flowing requirements down from primes on major shipbuilding programs.

SUSTAINMENT

In-service support

Requirements that live for the life of the vessel — refits, upgrades, and obsolescence management over 30+ years.

The Naval Program Problem

A frigate's worth of requirements, read by hand.

Naval solicitations are among the largest and most compliance-dense in defence. The way most teams handle them is exactly why bids slip and audits sting.

How it's done today

  • ×Thousands of shall-statements across combat, platform, and integration specs, extracted by hand
  • ×Compliance to MIL-STD and STANAG tracked in spreadsheets that drift out of date
  • ×No reliable thread from a naval requirement to its verification evidence
  • ×Amendments mid-bid that nobody can fully trace across a system this size

With the platform

  • Automated decomposition of the full solicitation into a structured requirements tree in hours
  • Standards-aligned compliance matrix mapped to MIL-STD, STANAG, and program-specific criteria
  • End-to-end traceability from need to requirement to verification, native in Azure DevOps
  • Impact analysis on amendments — see instantly what a change touches across the baseline
Speaks Your Language

Built to the vocabulary naval programs run on.

Not translated SaaS — the platform and its templates are aligned to the standards and terminology maritime bids are actually evaluated against.

MIL-STD STANAG NATO standardization MBSE model-based systems engineering V&V verification & validation ITB industrial & technological benefits CMMI-aligned templates Survivability requirements Configuration & change control Interface requirements DOORS legacy import

Bring us a naval solicitation — or a baseline. We'll show you the whole lifecycle.

A 25-minute demo on a realistic maritime RFP — structured, traceable, and compliant, with nothing sensitive required.